Posts tagged todd akin

Posts tagged todd akin
Know a man by the company he keeps.
How are we to believe that Mitt Romney doesn’t share these odious views when he doesn’t repudiate his many political associates who have them?
I don’t have any problem with fair pay at all, I think that’s a good idea,” Akin said in the meeting. “I have a healthy skepticism with big government getting in and trying to tell us everything we do in our lives. […]
“I think if you want to talk about how much somebody is paid, that should be a discussion between the employee and the employer,” he said. “We call it freedom. And for the government to stick its nose in and tell you how much you should pay somebody, I think it’s just wrong. I think it’s taking our freedom away.
Todd Akin on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Ah! So the government telling you whether you were raped or not and what you are allowed to do with your uterus is absolutely fine and not an infringement of freedom at all, but assuring that women make the same as men for doing the same work is evil and socialistic and the very antithesis of freedom. Thanks for clearing that up, Todd.
(Source: thatsonedeadflamingo)
I don’t have any problem with fair pay at all, I think that’s a good idea,” Akin said in the meeting. “I have a healthy skepticism with big government getting in and trying to tell us everything we do in our lives. […]
“I think if you want to talk about how much somebody is paid, that should be a discussion between the employee and the employer,” he said. “We call it freedom. And for the government to stick its nose in and tell you how much you should pay somebody, I think it’s just wrong. I think it’s taking our freedom away.
Todd Akin on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Ah! So the government telling you whether you were raped or not and what you are allowed to do with your uterus is absolutely fine and not an infringement of freedom at all, but assuring that women make the same as men for doing the same work is evil and socialistic and the very antithesis of freedom. Thanks for clearing that up, Todd.
I think we have a very clear path to victory, and apparently Claire McCaskill thinks we do, too, because she was very aggressive at the debate, which was quite different than it was when she ran against Jim Talent,” Akin said. “She had a confidence and was much more ladylike (in 2006), but in the debate on Friday she came out swinging, and I think that’s because she feels threatened.
Todd Akin
He’s at it again. He really needs to just stop talking - especially when the conversation concerns women in any way, shape, or form.
Read more here: http://midwestdemocracy.com/articles/todd-akin-confident-hell-prevail-over-claire-mccaskill/#storylink=cpy
Is it unspeakable or merely tastelessly ironic? My money’s on both.
Trigger warning for rape.
These women are fabulous.
Last week, the country convulsed with outrage over Missouri Republican Rep. Todd Akin’s false suggestion that women who are raped have a special bodily defense mechanism against getting pregnant. Akin’s claim stood out due to its highly offensive nature, but it’s reminiscent of any number of other parallel cases in which conservative Christians have cited dubious “facts” to help rationalize their moral convictions. Take the twin assertions that having an abortion causes breast cancer or mental disorders, for instance. Or the denial of human evolution. Or false claims that same-sex parenting hurts kids. Or that you can choose whether to be gay, and undergo therapy to reverse that choice. The ludicrous assertion that women who are raped have a physiological defense mechanism against pregnancy is just part of a long litany of other falsehoods in the Christian right’s moral and emotional war against science.
In fact, even as Akin reaped a whirlwind of disdain and disgust, a new scientific paper has appeared with uncanny timing in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, underscoring what is actually happening when people contort facts to justify their deep-seated beliefs or moral systems. Perhaps most strikingly, one punch line of the new research is that political conservatives, like Akin, appear to do this significantly more than political liberals.
- Chris Mooney (Salon)
Wow. What an incredibly shocking revelation… Seriously, this might well be the least surprising result of a scientific study in the history of scientific studies.
Mitt Romney met Jack Willke, the doctor credited with popularising Todd Akin’s controversial views on rape and abortion, during the current election campaign and told him they agreed on “almost everything,” Dr Willke said.
Yes. Because being called out for making ignorant, misogynistic, scientifically ridiculous remarks which invalidate the trauma suffered by millions of women istotallyas bad as being raped.
I’m going back to my corner to rage some more. I’ve had all the Republican stupidity and cruelty that I can stand for about ten lifetimes.
Why is everybody so down on rape? This is what Mike Huckabee wanted to know today, on his radio program, which also featured Rep. Todd “Legitimate Rape” Akin as a guest.
Thank you, Mr. Huckabee, for informing us about why raping women might not be so bad. What would we do without you? Hey, maybe we don’t need those silly laws making rape illegal after all!
Excuse me while I go somewhere and rage.
While Republicans at the national level were in a hurry to shove him aside, Republican opinion had not hardened against Mr. Akin in Missouri, in part because of the salience of the abortion issue. “The congressman is totally, firmly, solidly pro-life,” Sharon Barnes, a member of the state Republican central committee, said, adding that Mr. Akin believed “that abortion is never an option.”
Ms. Barnes echoed Mr. Akin’s statement that very few rapes resulted in pregnancy, adding that “at that point, if God has chosen to bless this person with a life, you don’t kill it.”
Jonathan Weisman and John W. Eligon (The New York Times)
Because when life hands you a horrible, scarring, painful violation, you should just make… Oh screw it. I can’t be flip about this. Because God has never caused anyone to rape anyone, let alone as a way to give the victim a baby as some sort of badly-wrapped present. This woman is a self-hating, misogynistic piece of garbage.
1. Kennedy believed that rape victims who chose abortion are “hysterical.” In “Abortion: Myths and Realities,” Kennedy labels victims of rape who chose unsafe abortions when safer procedures are illegal “hysterical,” saying “We are told by some of the radical feminists that the women will become hysterical, that they will abort themselves with coat hanger.” Abortion rates are, in fact, higher in nations where the procedure is criminalized, and men describing women whose choices they disapprove of as “hysterical” has a storied sexist history.
2. Kennedy suggests rape victims can be responsible for being raped. In “Life: An Inalienable Right,” Kennedy expresses concern that rape victims who chose to get an abortion are occasionally responsible for their own rape, saying that “Even if they want to say the woman had some part in it—which in most cases they probably don’t—surely the baby did nothing wrong, so the only innocent party is killed and the rapist often goes free.” He doesn’t elaborate on how this might be true, but another Kennedy sermon says “the immodest woman is contributing to the lust of other people” by wearing revealing clothing.
3. Kennedy held that the Bible should set our laws about rape and abortion. Kennedy is very explicit on this point, saying “In the Bible, the child of rape was allowed to live and the rapist was put to death. Today, we find that the penalties against rape have become more and more lenient, whereas the child is now the subject of capital punishment. Justice has been totally destroyed and perverted in that the guilty are practically allowed to go free and the innocent are killed.” This fits with Kennedy’s general view that we should “rebuild America based on the Bible.”
4. Kennedy thought husbands should determine if their wives can have abortions. Though not specifically addressing rape, Kennedy approvingly cited a Roman prohibition on abortion motivated by the husbands should have control over women’s reproductive choice, saying “That newly created life is as much the husband’s as it is the wife’s. Historically, it is interesting to note that when the Roman Empire did away with laws that allowed abortion, it was done not because of the woman or the harm that abortions were doing to women (and indeed they do vastly more harm than most people are aware of), but because the husband was being defrauded of his progeny.” Interestingly, Akin has worried that criminalizing marital rape provides women “a legal weapon to beat up on the husband.”
- Zach Beauchamp (Think Progress)
This is Claire McCaskill’s new campaign ad. Here’s hoping it does the trick and helps her turn the tide against Todd Akin.
Yes, it’s true: certain segments of our society are feckless enough to propagate these outright myths and lies.
(via thepoliticalfreakshow)
I love The Onion. I deeply and abidingly love The Onion. Because this? This is not just satire, but on a very profound level, it is absolutely true.